Magnetic recording medium evaluation apparatus and evaluation method

ABSTRACT

This invention provides a magnetic recording medium evaluation apparatus and evaluation method which yield results having good correlation with error rate measurements even when comparing media with different structures. Signals from a function generator are recorded in a magnetic recording medium. The recording signals are also passed through a first digital filter to obtain ideal restored signals. Reproduced signals from the magnetic recording medium are sampled in synchronization with the output from the function generator, and the discrete signals are passed through a second digital filter to obtain restored signals. The outputs from the first and second digital filters are input to an operational amplifier, and the difference between the restored signals and the ideal restored signals is taken for each sampling of the recording signals. The signal-to-noise ratio of the ideal restored signal to the average of the absolute value of this difference is used to evaluate signal quality.

This is a Divisional of co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 12/457,004, filed on May 28, 2009, the entire disclosure which is incorporated by reference. This application also claims foreign priority benefits under 35 USC 119 of Japanese patent application Ser. No. 2008-142637, filed May 30, 2008, the entire disclosure of which also is incorporated by reference.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

This invention relates to a magnetic recording medium evaluation apparatus and a magnetic recording medium evaluation method, and more specifically, relates to a magnetic recording medium evaluation apparatus for a hard disk magnetic recording medium, and to an evaluation method for such a medium.

2. Description of the Related Art

In magnetic recording and reproduction systems used in hard disk devices, PRML (partial response maximum-likelihood) technology is employed to perform high-density recording and reproduction. On the other hand, in the evaluation of magnetic heads and magnetic recording media used to construct magnetic recording and reproduction systems, recording is normally performed at fixed magnetization inversion intervals by causing inversion of the recording magnetic field of the magnetic recording head at equal time intervals in the magnetic recording medium rotating at constant velocity, and performing frequency-axis analyses of electrical signals obtained by a magnetoresistive reproduction element, again during rotation at constant velocity, to evaluate analog signal quality. In particular, the signal-to-noise ratio evaluated by a spectrum analyzer (MF-SpiSNR) when signals are recorded and reproduced at twice the interval of the specified magnetization inversion interval is widely used for evaluations of the signal quality of a magnetic recording and reproduction system, or of a magnetic recording medium, when the error rate is not directly measured. However, there are cases in which a highly customized dedicated LSI is used to perform random-pattern recording and reproduction in a specified channel, to evaluate the error rate directly.

While the above-described MF-SpiSNR is closely correlated with the error rate in relative evaluations of magnetic recording media when the macroscopic structure is substantially the same and processes are different, when performing evaluations of magnetic recording media with different structures, there is a problem that good correlation cannot necessarily be obtained. In order to measure directly the error rates for magnetic recording media with different structures, a dedicated signal processing circuit is required in addition to an analog signal evaluation system, and so there is a problem that such a magnetic recording medium evaluation apparatus is of limited applicability.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

This invention addresses the above problems, and has as an object the provision of a magnetic recording medium evaluation apparatus and evaluation method, which do not require a sophisticated signal processing circuit of limited applicability such as is required for error rate measurements, and which yields good correlation with error rates even when comparing media with different structures.

In order to attain these objects, a first aspect of the invention disclosed is a magnetic recording medium evaluation apparatus, comprising a spin stand which rotates the magnetic recording medium; a magnetic recording/reproduction head; a mechanism to position the magnetic recording/reproduction head above the magnetic recording medium; a signal generator for generating arbitrary recording signals x_(n); a recording circuit which processes the recording signals x_(n) for recording on the magnetic recording medium using the magnetic recording/reproduction head; and a reproduction circuit for providing, as reproduced signals y_(k), signals acquired from the magnetic recording medium using the magnetic recording/reproduction head, at a fixed sampling interval in synchronization with the recording signals x_(n). This embodiment of the invention also includes first and second digital filters. The first digital filter is a digital filter to which the recording signals x_(n) are input, which is represented by coefficients c_(nk) satisfying the relationship z_(n)=Σc_(nk)x_(k), and which outputs ideal restored signals z_(n) when the recording signals x_(n) are recorded. The second digital filter is a digital filter to which the reproduced signals y_(k) are input, which is represented by coefficients d_(nk) satisfying the relationship z′_(n)=Σd_(nk)y_(k) for restored signals z′_(n), the coefficients d_(nk) being the components of a matrix D=CA⁻¹ obtained by determining the relationship y_(n)=Σa_(nk)x_(k) between the previously sampled reproduced signals y_(k) and the recording signals x_(n), calculating an inverse matrix B=A⁻¹ of a square matrix A the components of which are the coefficients a_(nk), and multiplying from the right a matrix C the components of which are the coefficients c_(nk) by a matrix B=A⁻¹. The apparatus further includes comparison means for determining the difference between the output of the first digital filter and the output of the second digital filter; and calculating means for calculating a signal-to-noise ratio by taking an average of the absolute value of the difference determined by the comparison means as the denominator, and the amplitude of the ideal restored signals z_(n), as the numerator. In this first aspect of the invention, the recording circuit preferably comprises a digital to analog converter and the reproduction circuit preferably comprises an analog to digital converter. An operational amplifier is preferably used to perform the function of the comparison means. The first digital filter and the second digital filter may be implemented in software running on a microcomputer.

A second aspect of the invention disclosed is a magnetic recording medium evaluation apparatus, comprising a spin stand which rotates a magnetic recording medium; a magnetic recording/reproduction head; a mechanism to position the magnetic recording/reproduction head above the magnetic recording medium; and a signal generator for generating square-wave signals at an arbitrary frequency f_(s). In this embodiment of the invention, there is a recording circuit which processes the square-wave signals at frequency f_(s) for recording on the magnetic recording medium using the magnetic recording/reproduction head; and a spectrum analyzer which performs frequency analysis of reproduced signals y_(k) reproduced by the magnetic recording/reproduction head, and generates a power spectrum of the waveform of the reproduced signals y_(k). This embodiment also includes storage means for storing a function E_(f) obtained, when the relationship between the recording signals x_(n) and signals to be restored z_(n) is expressed by z_(n)=Σc_(nk)x_(k) and the relationship between the reproduced signals y_(k) and the recording signals x_(n) is expressed by y_(n)=Σa_(nk)x_(k), by calculating a matrix B which has b_(nk) as components and which is an inverse matrix B=A⁻¹ of a square matrix A the components of which are the coefficients a_(nk), multiplying from the right a matrix C the components of which are coefficients c_(nk) by a matrix B=A⁻¹ to determine a matrix D=CA⁻¹, and by performing a discrete Fourier transform on the series e_(m)=d_(m+k,k) satisfying z′_(n)=Σe_(n−k)y_(k) for signals to be restored z′_(n) expressed by z′_(n)=Σd_(nk)y_(k) from the components d_(nk) of the matrix D and the reproduced signals y_(k). This apparatus further includes calculating means for calculating, for the power spectrum generated by the spectrum analyzer, a signal-to-noise ratio by taking as the denominator a value obtained by adding values obtained by multiplying each frequency component of the power spectrum by the square of the function E_(f), excluding the vicinities of the frequency f_(s) and harmonics thereof, and as the numerator a value of the power spectrum at the frequency f_(s) multiplied by the square of the value of the function E_(f) at the frequency f_(s). In this second aspect of the invention, the recording circuit preferably comprises a digital to analog converter. The storage means and the calculating means may be implemented in software running on a microcomputer.

For either of the above discussed embodiments of the disclosed magnetic recording medium evaluation apparatus, a method for estimating the coefficients a_(nk) is to measure the signal intensities when signals are recorded at least two linear recording densities and reproduced, and estimate the coefficients a_(nk) based on the differences in the reproduced signal intensities at the linear recording densities.

Another aspect of the disclosed invention is a method for evaluation of a magnetic recording medium, having a step of rotating the magnetic recording medium; a step of positioning a magnetic recording/reproduction head above the magnetic recording medium; a step of generating arbitrary recording signals x_(n); a step of processing the recording signals x_(n) for recording on the magnetic recording medium using the magnetic recording/reproduction head; and a step of processing, at a fixed sampling interval in synchronization with the recording signals x_(n), signals acquired from the magnetic recording medium using the magnetic recording/reproduction head, to produce reproduced signals y_(k). In addition, this method includes a step of filtering the recorded signals x_(n) to produce ideal restored signals z_(n), and a step of filtering the reproduced signals y_(k) to produce restored signals z′_(n). In the step producing ideal restored signals z_(n) the recording signals x_(n) are acquired, and for ideal restored signals z_(n) which are to be restored when the recording signals x_(n) are recorded, ideal restored signals z_(n) are generated based on the relationship z_(n)=Σ_(nk)x_(k). In the step producing restored signals z′_(n), the reproduced signals y_(k) are acquired, the relationship y_(n)=Σa_(nk)x_(k) between the previously sampled reproduced signals y_(k) and the recording signals x_(n) is determined, an inverse matrix B=A⁻¹ of a square matrix A the components of which are the coefficients a_(nk) is calculated, and restored signals z′_(n) are produced based on the relationship of the restored signals z′_(n)=Σd_(nk)y_(k) from the components of a matrix D=CA⁻¹ obtained by multiplying from the right a matrix C the components of which are the coefficients c_(nk) by a matrix B=A⁻¹. Further, the method has a step of calculating a signal-to-noise ratio by taking an average of the absolute value of the difference between the ideal restored signals z_(n) and the restored signals z′_(n), as the denominator, and the amplitude of the ideal restored signals z_(n), as the numerator. Preferably, the step of processing the recording signals x_(n) for recording comprises a digital to analog conversion, and the step of processing signals acquired from the magnetic recording medium comprises an analog to digital conversion synchronized with the recording signals x_(n).

A further aspect of the disclosed invention is a method for evaluation of a magnetic recording medium, having a step of rotating the magnetic recording medium; a step of positioning a magnetic recording/reproduction head above the magnetic recording medium; and a step of generating square-wave signals at an arbitrary frequency f_(s). In addition, this aspect of the invention has a step of processing the square-wave signals at frequency f_(s) for recording on the magnetic recording medium using the magnetic recording/reproduction head, and a step of performing frequency analysis of reproduced signals y_(k) reproduced from the magnetic recording medium by the magnetic recording/reproduction head, and generating the power spectrum of the waveform of the reproduced signals y_(k). Further, the method has a step of storing a function E_(f) obtained, when the relationship between the recording signals x_(n) and signals to be restored z_(n) is expressed by z_(n)=Σc_(nk)x_(k), and the relationship between the reproduced signals y_(k) and the recording signals x_(n) is expressed by y_(n)=Σa_(nk)x_(k), by calculating a matrix B which has b_(nk) as components and which is an inverse matrix B=A⁻¹ of a square matrix A the components of which are the coefficients a_(nk), multiplying from the right a matrix C the components of which are coefficients c_(nk) by a matrix B=A⁻¹ to determine a matrix D=CA⁻¹, and by performing a discrete Fourier transform on the series e_(m)=d_(m+k,k) satisfying z′_(n)=Σe_(n−k)y_(k) for signals to be restored z′_(n) expressed by z′_(n)=Σd_(nk)y_(k) from the components d_(nk) of the matrix D and the reproduced signals y_(k), and a step of calculating, for the power spectrum, a signal-to-noise ratio by taking as the denominator a value obtained by adding values obtained by multiplying each frequency component of the power spectrum by the square of the function E_(f), excluding the vicinities of the frequency f_(s) and harmonics thereof, and as the numerator a value of the power spectrum at the frequency f_(s) multiplied by the square of the value of the function E_(f) at the frequency f_(s). Preferably, the step of processing the square-wave signals at frequency f_(s) for recording comprises a digital to analog conversion.

For either of the above discussed magnetic recording medium evaluation methods, a method for estimating the coefficients a_(nk) is to measure the signal intensities when signals are recorded at least two linear recording densities and reproduced, and estimate the coefficients a_(nk) based on the differences in the reproduced signal intensities at the linear recording densities.

By means of this invention, magnetic recording medium evaluation is possible which provides good correlation with the error rate even when comparing media with different structures, without requiring sophisticated signal processing circuitry of limited applicability, as is required for error rate measurements.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 shows the configuration of the magnetic recording medium evaluation apparatus according to the first aspect of the invention;

FIG. 2 is a graph showing, for each sampling of the recorded signal in the apparatus of FIG. 1, the ideal restored signal output from a first filter when reproduced from recording at 1200 kfci, using a perpendicular recording head and perpendicular magnetic recording medium, and the restored signal resulting from processing of the reproduced signal by a second filter;

FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating the magnetic recording medium evaluation apparatus of the second aspect of the invention;

FIG. 4A is a graph showing the correlation between the evaluated SNR and the measured error rate for the method of the second aspect of the invention; and

FIG. 4B is a graph showing the correlation between the conventional SpiSNR and the measured error rate.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Below, aspects of the invention are explained in detail, referring to the drawings. It should be kept in mind that the following described embodiments are only presented by way of example and should not be construed as limiting the inventive concept to any particular physical configuration. Further, if used and unless otherwise stated, the terms “upper,” “lower,” “front,” “back,” “over,” “under,” and similar such terms are not to be construed as limiting the invention to a particular orientation. Instead, these terms are used only on a relative basis.

(Aspect 1)

FIG. 1 shows in simplified block diagram form the configuration of the magnetic recording medium evaluation apparatus according to Aspect 1 of the invention. To evaluate a hard disk magnetic recording medium 10, the apparatus includes a spin stand (not shown) which rotates the magnetic recording medium 10, a magnetic recording/reproduction head (not shown), and a mechanism (not shown) to position the magnetic recording/reproduction head above the magnetic recording medium 10. Arbitrary signals x_(n) are generated by a function generator 101 and are digital to analog converted by a head amplifier DAC (digital to analog converter) 102, and the resulting signals are recorded in the magnetic recording medium 10 to be measured by the magnetic recording/reproduction head. In addition, accurate restored signals z_(n) are obtained from the recording signals output from the function generator 101 via the digital filter B 105. Reproduced signals recorded in the magnetic recording medium 10 are acquired by the recording/reproduction head and sampled by the head amplifier ADC (analog to digital converter) 103 in synchronization with a synchronization signal output from the function generator 101, and the discrete signals obtained, y_(n), are passed through the digital filter A 104 to obtain the restored signals z′_(n). By inputting to an operational amplifier 106 the outputs of the filter A 104 and the filter B 105, the difference between the restored signal which is the output of the filter A 104 and the ideal restored signal which is the output of the filter B 105 is obtained for each sampling of the reproduced signal. A computation unit 107 computes a signal-to-noise ratio by taking an average of the absolute value of this difference from the operational amplifier as the denominator, and the ideal restored signal intensity as the numerator. The signal-to-noise ratio is used to evaluate signal quality.

In this aspect of the invention, the filter B 105 is represented by coefficients c_(nk) which satisfy the relationship z_(n)=Σc_(nk)x_(k) for signals z_(n) which are to be restored when arbitrary recording signals x_(n) are recorded.

Further, the filter A 104 is represented by coefficients d_(nk) which, when the relationship y_(n)=Σa_(nk)x_(k) between reproduced signals y_(n) and recording signals x_(k) is determined in advance, and the matrix B=A⁻¹ which is the inverse matrix of the square matrix A the components of which are a_(nk), that is, the matrix B the components of which are the coefficients b_(nk) satisfying the relationship x_(n)=Σb_(nk)y_(k) is computed, are the components of the matrix D=CA⁻¹ obtained by multiplying from the right the matrix C the components of which are the coefficients c_(nk) by the matrix B=A⁻¹, that is, the components of matrix D satisfy the relationship z′_(n)=Σd_(nk)y_(k).

The filter A 104, the filter B 105, the operational amplifier 106, and the computation unit 107 may be provided as software installed in a microcomputer or similar equipment, or another apparatus having equivalent functions can be substituted.

FIG. 2 is a graph showing, for each sampling of the reproduced signal, the ideal restored signal output from the filter B 105 (dashed plot) when reproduced from recording at 1200 kfci, using a perpendicular recording head and perpendicular magnetic recording medium, and the restored signal resulting from processing of the reproduced signal by the filter A 104 (solid plot). Here, the computation to obtain the ideal restored signals from the recording signals is c_(n,n+1)=1, c_(n,n−1)=−1, and all other coefficients are 0. The ideal restored signal output has the three values 1, 0, −1, and the signal quality is evaluated by comparing the output from the filter A at each point with the ideal restored signal output from the filter B.

(Aspect 2)

FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating the magnetic recording medium evaluation apparatus of Aspect 2 of the invention. To evaluate a hard disk magnetic recording medium 10, the apparatus includes a spin stand (not shown) which rotates the magnetic recording medium 10, a magnetic recording/reproduction head (not shown), and a mechanism (not shown) to position the magnetic recording/reproduction head above the magnetic recording medium 10. Square-wave signals at an arbitrary frequency f_(s) are generated by the function generator 201, are D-to-A converted by the head amplifier DAC 202, and are recorded as signals in the magnetic recording medium being measured 10 by the magnetic recording/reproduction head. A power spectrum is determined by a spectrum analyzer 203 from signals reproduced using the magnetic recording/reproduction head from the signals recorded in the magnetic recording medium 10. Also, a function E_(f) relating to frequency is prepared in advance and stored in memory 204, and a value obtained by an adder 205 by multiplying the above power spectrum by the square of the function E_(f) is sent to a computation unit 206. The computation unit 206 calculates the signal-to-noise ratio by taking the value obtained by addition, excluding the vicinities of the frequency f_(s) and harmonics thereof, as the denominator, and the value of the power at the frequency f_(s) multiplied by the square of E_(f) at the frequency f_(s) as the numerator.

The memory 204, adder 205, and computation unit 206 may be provided as software installed in a microcomputer or similar equipment, or another apparatus having equivalent functions can be substituted.

For this aspect of the invention, the function E_(f) relating to frequency is explained. First, when the relationship between arbitrary recording signals x_(n) and the signals to be restored z_(n) is expressed as z_(n)=Σc_(nk)x_(k), and the relationship between the reproduced signals y_(k) and the recording signals x_(n) is expressed as y_(n)=Σa_(nk)x_(k), the inverse matrix B=A⁻¹ of the square matrix A, the components of which are the coefficients a_(nk), that is, the matrix B the components of which are the coefficients b_(nk) in the relationship x_(n)=Σb_(nk)y_(k), is calculated. Next, the matrix D=CA⁻¹ is obtained by multiplying from the right the matrix C, the components of which are the coefficients c_(nk), by the matrix B=A⁻¹. Using the components d_(nk) of this matrix D, signals z′_(n) to be restored from the reproduced signals y_(k) are expressed by z′_(n)=Σd_(nk)y_(k), and by performing a discrete Fourier transform of the series e_(m)=d_(m+k,k) satisfying z′_(n)=Σe_(n−k)y_(k) for the signals to be restored z′_(n), the function E_(f) is obtained.

Next, the method of determining the coefficients a_(nk) is explained. Suppose for examine that the signal intensities when square-wave signals are recorded and reproduced at inversion intervals which are 1×, 3×, 5×, and 7× the minimum magnetization inversion intervals are respectively TAA₁, TAA₃, TAA₅, and TAA₇. Assuming that intersymbol interference is symmetric, y_(j)=a₀*x_(j)+a₁*x_(j−1)+a₁*x_(j+1)+a₂*x_(j−2)+a₂*x_(j+2)+a₃*x_(j−3)+a₃*x_(j+3). Reproduced amplitudes when recording square-wave signals at inversion intervals of 1×, 3×, 5×, and 7× are respectively expressed by a₀−2a₁+2a₂−2a₃, a₀+2a₁−2a₂−2a₃, a₀+2a₁+2a₂−2a₃, and a₀+2a₁+2a₂+2a₃; by regarding these as equal to TAA₁, TAA₃, TAA₅, and TAA₇, respectively, the coefficients a₀ to a₃ can be obtained.

FIG. 4A and FIG. 4B compare the results when using the method of this aspect of the invention to evaluate perpendicular media with various structures, and the results when using error rates in direct evaluations. In FIG. 4A, a graph is shown of the correlation between the SNR evaluated using the method of this aspect of the invention and the measured error rate. In FIG. 4B, a graph is shown of the correlation between the conventional SpiSNR and the measured error rate. It is clear that the correlation with the error rate is improved in FIG. 4A as compared with FIG. 4B.

One method for estimating the coefficients a_(nk), which is applicable to both embodiments of the magnetic recording medium evaluation apparatus described in this application, is to measure the signal intensities when signals are recorded at at least two linear recording densities and reproduced, and estimate the coefficients a_(nk) based on the differences in the reproduced signal intensities at the linear recording densities.

It will be apparent to one skilled in the art that the manner of making and using the claimed invention has been adequately disclosed in the above-written description of the preferred embodiments taken together with the drawings. It will be understood that the above description of the preferred embodiments of the present invention are susceptible to various modifications, changes and adaptations, and the same are intended to be comprehended within the meaning and range of equivalents of the appended claims. 

1. An apparatus for evaluation of a magnetic recording medium, the apparatus comprising: a spin stand which rotates the magnetic recording medium; a magnetic recording/reproduction head; a mechanism to position the magnetic recording/reproduction head above the magnetic recording medium; a signal generator for generating arbitrary recording signals x_(n); a recording circuit which processes the recording signals x_(n) for recording on the magnetic recording medium using the magnetic recording/reproduction head; a reproduction circuit for providing, as reproduced signals y_(k), signals acquired from the magnetic recording medium using the magnetic recording/reproduction head, at a fixed sampling interval in synchronization with the recording signals x_(n); a first digital filter to which the recording signals x_(n) are input, and which outputs ideal restored signals z_(n) when the recording signals x_(n) are recorded; a second digital filter to which the reproduced signals y_(k) are input, and which outputs restored signals z′_(n); comparison means for determining the difference between the output z_(n) of the first digital filter and the output z′_(n) of the second digital filter; and calculating means for calculating a signal-to-noise ratio by taking an average of the absolute value of the difference determined by the comparison means as the denominator, and the amplitude of the ideal restored signals z_(n), as the numerator.
 2. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the first digital filter is represented by coefficients c_(nk) satisfying the relationship z_(n)=Σc_(nk)x_(k), and wherein the second digital filter is represented by coefficients d_(nk) satisfying the relationship z′_(n)=Σd_(nk)y_(k), the coefficients d_(nk) being the components of a matrix D=CA⁻¹ obtained by determining the relationship y_(n)=Σa_(nk)x_(k) between the previously sampled reproduced signals y_(k) and the recording signals x_(n), calculating an inverse matrix B=A⁻¹ of a square matrix A the components of which are the coefficients a_(nk), and multiplying from the right a matrix C the components of which are the coefficients c_(nk), by the matrix B=A⁻¹.
 3. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the recording circuit comprises a digital to analog converter, and the reproduction circuit comprises an analog to digital converter synchronized with the signal generator.
 4. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the comparison means comprises an operational amplifier.
 5. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the first digital filter and the second digital filter are implemented in software running on a microcomputer.
 6. The apparatus according to claim 2, wherein the signal intensities are measured when signals are recorded at at least two linear recording densities and reproduced, and the coefficients a_(nk) are estimated based on the differences in the reproduced signal intensities at the linear recording densities.
 7. A method for evaluation of a magnetic recording medium, the method comprising the steps of: rotating the magnetic recording medium; positioning a magnetic recording/reproduction head above the magnetic recording medium; generating arbitrary recording signals x_(n); processing the recording signals x_(n) for recording on the magnetic recording medium using the magnetic recording/reproduction head; processing, at a fixed sampling interval in synchronization with the recording signals x_(n), signals acquired from the magnetic recording medium using the magnetic recording/reproduction head, to produce reproduced signals y_(k); filtering the recording signals x_(n) to produce ideal restored signals z_(n) when the recording signals x_(n) are recorded; filtering the reproduced signals y_(k), to produce restored signals z′_(n); and calculating a signal-to-noise ratio by taking an average of the absolute value of the difference between the ideal restored signals z_(n) and the restored signals z′_(n), as the denominator, and the amplitude of the ideal restored signals z_(n), as the numerator.
 8. The method according to claim 7, wherein the step of processing the recording signals x_(n) for recording comprises a digital to analog conversion, and the step of processing signals acquired from the magnetic recording medium comprises an analog to digital conversion synchronized with the recording signals x_(n).
 9. The method according to claim 7, wherein the step of filtering the recording signals x_(n) to produce ideal restored signals z_(n), is based on the relationship z_(n)=Σc_(nk)x_(k), and wherein the step of filtering the reproduced signals y_(k), to produce restored signals z′_(n), is based on the relationship z′_(n)=Σd_(nk)y_(k), the coefficients d_(nk) being components of a matrix D=CA⁻¹ obtained by determining the relationship y_(n)=Σa_(nk)x_(k) between the previously sampled reproduced signals y_(k) and the recording signals x_(n), calculating an inverse matrix B=A⁻¹ of a square matrix A the components of which are the coefficients a_(nk), and multiplying from the right a matrix C the components of which are the coefficients c_(nk) by a matrix B=A⁻¹.
 10. The method according to claim 8, wherein the signal intensities are measured when signals are recorded at least two linear recording densities and reproduced, and the coefficients a_(nk) are estimated based on the differences in the reproduced signal intensities at the linear recording densities. 